The Long Tail of the Super Chinese Water Infrastructure: Less is More (FresnoBee)

Mar.09, 2009 in Drought, Water Conservation, Water Crisis, Water Management

(March 8, 2009, The Fresno Bee)

It is China’s latest grand attempt to tame nature. Three canals will bring water hundreds of miles to Beijing and other thirsty cities in the north. More than 350,000 people in the way will be forced to move.

For many in Zhangyigang, a village of 942 people in brick and mud houses in central China, it will be their second uprooting. They moved to higher ground in the late 1950s and 1960s when a dam was built on the Han River to create the Danjiangkou reservoir, submerging homes and temples. Now their next stop is to be Dengzhou, a busy market city 30 miles to the east, as the dam is raised.

“We are made to keep moving,” said Zhang Jiqing, 53, crouching by his bags of dried corn, which he fears won’t fetch a good price because of the financial crisis. “I have a deep longing for my old place. But what can I do if the government says we have to move? It is for the good of the nation.”

Now, that is coming under question.

Experts and environmentalists say it’s time China took a different approach to its growth-related challenges, one based on conservation rather than engineering.

That may not come easy in a country with a long history of megaprojects. When China wanted to keep out foreign invaders, it built the Great Wall. When it wanted to move rice, it built the 1,100-mile Grand Canal. When it needed electricity, it built the Three Gorges Dam, completed in 2006.

“States that continue to have a monopoly on political power do tend toward these large engineering solutions,” said David Pietz, a Washington State University professor who focuses on the water policies of the 60-year-old communist government.

Alternatives include using water more efficiently, desalinating seawater and recycling wastewater – to water golf courses, for example.

There are signs that government officials, many of them trained engineers, are beginning to heed their critics.

The most expensive and technically difficult leg of the canal project has been postponed for more study after scientists questioned its feasibility. Another leg has been delayed for four years to smooth the resettlement process.

Perhaps most important, a key official concedes that the project won’t slake the north’s thirst for long.

“It can only be a supplement to the water shortage in the short term,” Zhang Jiyao, the minister in charge of the water project, told The Associated Press. “More important, we must depend on saving water.”

It was Mao Zedong, founder of communist China, who first dreamed of the canal project in 1952, remarking that the wet south should share water with the dry north. The densely populated north China plain that includes Beijing has only about 8 percent of the country’s water resources.

The result: a project estimated at $62 billion, more expensive than the Three Gorges Dam. It would transfer 12 trillion gallons a year from the Yangtze and its tributaries to wheat farms and fast-growing northern cities.

The eastern route, to be completed in 2013, follows the remains of the Grand Canal, completed some 1,400 years ago, and will use pumping stations to raise the water 130 feet before it descends into the booming coastal city of Tianjin and Shandong province.

The western route has been postponed pending further study. As currently proposed, it would dam three rivers high in the Tibetan plateau and tunnel more than 60 miles through mountain rock.

The central route, where work began in 2002, will take water from the Danjiangkou Reservoir across three provinces to supply about a quarter of Beijing’s water and 20 other cities. In all, nearly 400,000 people will have to move.

(Original Article Here)