(Feb. 4, 2009, Steamboat Pilot & Today)

— Steamboat Springs residents would be left with only half of the water needed to serve current demands if downstream states made a call on the Colorado River Compact, officials told the Steamboat Springs City Council on Tuesday.

The sobering revelation un­­derscored council’s consideration of adopting a water dedication policy that would require the developers of annexed properties to bring water rights, or resources to develop existing water rights, to the table as a condition of annexation. Council members directed their water attorney — Fritz Holleman, of Boulder firm Porzak, Browning & Bushong — to return with such an ordinance and participated in a fiery discussion with developers seeking annexation who warned the additional burden could scramble plans for planned communities aimed at addressing other needs such as affordable housing and transportation improvements.

Holleman also told council that Colorado Water Division Six, which includes the Yampa Valley, is the only division of the state’s seven that has a water surplus and thus is being targeted by outside interests.

“I think you’ve got a great big bull’s-eye on you from every other water user in the state,” Holleman said.

While a recently adopted Steamboat Water Supply Master Plan concluded that “both the city and the (Mount Werner Water) district have a reliable long-term supply source … capable of meeting projected demands throughout the next 20 years,” Pub­­lic Works Director Philo Shelton said the master plan did not include risk assessments for scenarios such as a call on the Colorado River Compact because such issues are being evaluated at the state level.

Most of the city’s and district’s water rights are junior to the 1922 compact. In his recommendations for a water dedication policy ordinance, Holleman is recommending that the city indicate a strong preference for water rights senior to 1922.

Council members were unanimous in directing Holleman to return with a water dedication policy to consider for adoption. They were less unified about whether to apply the new policy to projects already seeking annexation such as Steamboat 700. Ultimately, council directed city staff to work with Steamboat 700 to pay some portion of the cost of the improvements needed to develop existing water rights to serve the property that is proposing about 2,000 homes on 508 acres west of city limits.

“This water rights discussion can have a serious and detrimental effect depending on what they request,” Steamboat 700 Project Manager Danny Mulcahy said. “Steam­­boat 700 can do a lot for this community, but it can’t do everything.”

Also Tuesday, council ap­­proved two high-profile planning ordinances pertaining to secondary units and historic preservation. The historic preservation ordinance will replace current policies governing the historic preservation review process. The new policy — like the old — will mandate that some properties undergo a historic preservation review process, but compliance with the review board’s recommendations will be voluntary.

The ordinance approved Tuesday, however, will subject fewer properties to the review because it will require it only for structures 50 years or older that also would be eligible for listing on a newly created city historic register. The previous policy required a review of all structures 50 years or older regardless of their historic value.

The secondary unit ordinance will close an enforcement loophole and require inspection for health and safety issues of secondary units, which are small, long-term rentals located on the same lots as principal dwelling units. In an effort to qualify more units for approval — and hopefully have their owners register them — council removed an occupancy provision requiring the owners of secondary units to live on site in the main residence.

Also, for eight months, the city and the Routt County Regional Building Department will eliminate or reduce fees to encourage owners to legalize unregistered units. The ordinance was driven by a man’s death last year of smoke inhalation in an illegal converted garage apartment in Old Town that lacked smoke detectors.

(Original Article Here)

Bookmark Me!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Furl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis

Related posts:

  1. ‘Wet Water’ Vs. ‘Paper Water’: New Eric Kuhn Study — Colorado River with Only 150,000 Acre Feet (AF) of Additional Water Left for Colorado Itself, According to the Colorado River Compact; 10% of ‘Paper Water’ Lies!!! — “I’d Rather be Upstream with a Shovel and a Ditch than Downstream with a Decree.” (Aquadoc, WaterWired) (March 4, 2009, Aquadoc, WaterWired) The current issue (2 March...
  2. Canadian Company, Ice River Springs, to Begin Bottling Water from Floridian Acquifer this February (JCFloridan) (Jan. 20, 2009, JCFloridan) A new water bottling plant in...
  3. Teach a Man How to Fish, but Take Away His Right to Fish: Water Policy, Water Police, Water Rights (LeakBird) There’s an interesting ESPN article on the coming water policy...
  4. Lower Colorado River Basin States California, Nevada, Arizona will Look to Mexico for Water? (WaterWired) (Jan. 20, 2009, WaterWired) Susan Greene’s column in the 15...
  5. Many States Have Their Drinking Straws In The Colorado River, Yet The State Itself (CO) Doesn’t Have Enough Water To Meet Its Own Needs on East Slope (Les Williams, DenverPost) (Dec. 30, 2008, Denver Post) Finances are tight for a...